In Search of the Unknown - Cryptozoology

77

By danmayerisgod

I am among those who believe there are creatures in this world that, according to mainstream biology, do not exist. Cryptozoology is the title given to the study of legendary or otherwise unknown creatures. These may include animals thought to be extinct such as dinosaurs, or legendary creatures such as Bigfoot or El Chupacabra. These animals are sometimes referred to as 'cryptids'.

Although I have never personally encountered anything that could qualify as a cryptid, I am an avid believer in the theories behind many lengendary creatures, and I consider myself an amateur cryptozoologist. In the interest of others who share my interests, I am collecting some basic information on some well-known cryptids. I plan to eventually write whole hubs dedicated to individual creatures, but for now I'll just give an overview of some of the most well-known ones.

If anyone on Hubpages has encountered a cryptid, write a hub about it and I'll link to you here.

Simple hoax, or a legendary creature caught on camera?
See all 4 photos
Simple hoax, or a legendary creature caught on camera?

Bigfoot

Bigfoot, or Sasquatch, is a legendary creature believed to exist somewhere in the forests of North America, mainly the Pacific Northwest. It is described as a large (over 7 feet tall), hairy, bipedal humanoid or ape that walks like a human being. In other parts of the world, legends exist of similar creatures, though these are referred to as Yeti or the Abominable Snowman.

A few scientists and Bigfoot believers have theorized that the creature is some kind of missing link between prehistoric creatures and modern man. This theory is primarily speculative, as there have never been any fossils or other concrete evidence recovered to confirm it. Many hopeful cryptozoologists have recovered alleged Bigfoot footprints, but none substantial enough to definitely prove the existence of an unknown bipedal humanoid in the Pacific Northwest.

Bigfoot is a staple of American folklore. Most have heard of it; few believe it really exists. Although contemporary scientists doubt that such a creature could exist in secret in America's forests, numerous reports of Bigfoot sightings have been generated over the years, some as far back as the mid-1800s, and as recently as the 21st century. While many of these are obvious hoaxes or misidentification of other species, a great many eyewitness accounts remain unexplained, and the legend continues to exist to this day.


Artist's interpretation
Artist's interpretation
A wild coyote carcass discovered in Texas. Could this really be the chupacabra?
A wild coyote carcass discovered in Texas. Could this really be the chupacabra?

El Chupacabra

In Spanish, 'el chupacabra' literally means 'the goatsucker.' The creature allegedly survives by killing livestock like goats and draining their blood from their necks. The legend of this creature is relatively new. Reports of the creature only go back as far as 1995, but attacks are reported with great frequency every year, primarily in Puerto Rico, Mexico, and other Latin American nations, but the creature has been reported as far north as Maine, and as far south as the nation of Chile.

Physical descriptions of the creature seem to vary. It is supposedly a large creature, roughly the size of a small bear or mountain lion, with a row of spines down its back to the base of the tail. Other than that, it's appearance varies from witness to witness. The primary reason for this seems to be that relatively few people reporting the creature have actually seen it. Most of the time, reports occur the morning after the alleged creature has attacked. Latin American farmers wake up one morning to find one or more of their goats or sheep dead, each with two to three puncture wounds on their neck or chest, and the blood almost completely drained from their bodies.

The credibility of this creature has come into question in recent years after it was allegedly captured on several different occasions. Most notably, a woman in Texas found several strange animal carcasses. After closer examination, the bodies were confirmed by scientists to be those of wild coyotes. However, the bodies in question had greyish hairless skin and large fang-like teeth, which could not be explained.

In some ways, the discovery of the coyotes raised more questions than it answered. Are these strange mutated coyotes really the chupacabras? Could they be responsible for all the livestock mutilations that have occurred since the 1990's? If so, what could have caused the mutation and their strange behavior? And if they're not the real chupacabra, if there even is one, then where is it? Despite the vigilant efforts of people all across North and Central America, this creature still remains a mystery.

Nessie - The Loch Ness Monster

Nicknamed 'Nessie' after the body of water it allegedly lives in, the Loch Ness Monster is a huge plesiosaur-like creature that is reported to live in the Loch Ness of Scotland. Originally sighted in the 1930's, the legend of this beast has turned the Scottish loch into a tourist trap, as stories of the creature have spread across the globe.

Most reputable scientists dismiss this creature as mere folklore. Sightings of the creature can often be explained by misidentification of other aquatic creatures, fallen trees and branches in the water, boat wakes, and other optical illusions. The pattern of a saurian shape is known to many people, so it's easy to see how someone could mistakenly see this pattern in nature and mistake it for an actual prehistoric creature.

Credibility of the creature is also hurt by the abundance of hoaxes that exist. One of the very earliest and most iconic alleged photographs of the creature is the Surgeon's Photograph (shown below). However, it was confirmed many years later to be nothing more than a clever hoax.

The Surgeon's Photograph, later revealed to be a hoax
The Surgeon's Photograph, later revealed to be a hoax

Comments

Candie V profile image

Candie V Level 4 Commenter 3 years ago

ooh, Big foot! A subject near and dear to our hearts up here in WA!! I had an uncle-in-law who swore he existed and spent years collecting evidence.. I've never seen the evidence, if any exists. So who knows, but that picture is the one you always see when the topic comes up.. If I find evidence you will get the scoop first!!

C.Ferreira profile image

C.Ferreira 3 years ago

This is a great Hub! I don't see why Bigfoot couldn't exist. I don't think that he really does, but it is possible. We already have evidence of a bipedal giant ape called, gigantopithecus, so to say that Bigfoot can't exist is naive!

Chupacabra...in all likelihood the cases can be explained by vampire bats. I'm pretty doubtful of this one, but that hairless creature thing is messed up. There was also one that washed up on shore somewhere which was really nasty looking too!

Nessy is probably the most believable of the bunch, but it is still hard to think that only one of something can exist. The fact that we had creatures that looked like this at one point make it more believable than say the chupacabra....

Awesome Hub, very intriguing, and I look forward to more! You got my vote for this weeks HubNugget!

danmayerisgod profile image

danmayerisgod Hub Author 3 years ago

Vampire bats? Unlikely. They're not really native to that area, and even if they were, they're little bats. They usually don't drink nearly enough of an animal's blood to kill it.

C.Ferreira profile image

C.Ferreira 3 years ago

I beg to differ..."attacks are reported with great frequency every year, primarily in Puerto Rico, Mexico, and other Latin American nations,"

From AmericaZoo.com, "Location: Mexico to Chile and northern Argentina in South America."

So they are native to that area, and as far as not drinking enough blood to kill an animal...

"They feed on blood, mainly of cattle and other livestock, often attacking the same animal night after night."

A pint of blood every night could definitely kill a goat!

danmayerisgod profile image

danmayerisgod Hub Author 3 years ago

Alright, I guess I was mistaken about their habitat. It's possible, I guess. Some of the pictures I've seen looked a bit too gruesome to be the work of a bat, though. Unless they're in the habit of biting the same animal slightly to the side of the previous bite, the marks seem to point to something with larger jaws than a bat.

C.Ferreira profile image

C.Ferreira 3 years ago

Bats can do some serious damage! They give the live stock diseases like rabies. They definitely will bite the animal in the same general area each time. They are pre-programmed to bit a specific part of the body to get the easiest flow of blood!

frogdropping profile image

frogdropping 3 years ago

dan - Dragons exist. I have one. He's a heavy smoker too.

Just because you can't see it or have no direct evidence of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Hello people? Faith ...

Great hub :)

ripplemaker profile image

ripplemaker Level 6 Commenter 3 years ago

Hi Dan, have you heard? This hub is one of the 15 hubnuggets that has been nominated. Yippee! Click this link to find out: http://hubpages.com/_143hub/Time-for-The-Nugget-Aw

See how this thing works, read all the other hubnuggets and be sure to vote. Spread the word and get the chance of winning. Good luck!

Mardi profile image

Mardi Level 3 Commenter 3 years ago

Wow, you really did a great job on this hub. I have a neighbor that swears 'el chupacabra' is in fact real and has been spotted in his native country of Mexico on many occasions. There are many things in this world that aren't easily explained - keep on searching!

Glen 2 years ago

Your comment that the coyote carcasses had unexplained features such as the lack of hair and fangs is misleading, since such features are readily explained. The hairless aspect is likely due to mange--a condition of mite infestation that can strip an animal of most of its hair. Coyotes like all canids do have large canine teeth, which often look more promitent on mangy animls because they are more visible. Open any coyote (or wolf, or large dog) mouth and there you'll often find quite large "fangs" (which vary in length of course among individuals and from species to species).

Multiman 14 months ago

Love the article

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working